Your Submissions: Latest  Popular  Most Comments 

EU Parliament votes 663-13 against ACTA's enforcement measures

The European Parliament resoundingly voted against the secret Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), in a resounding 663 to 13 tally. The parliamentarians defied the EU executive and threatened to take the issue to the European Court of Justice if the EU doesn't reject ACTA's provisions on disconnection for infringement and other enforcement provisions.

A strong majority of MEPs (663 against and 13 in favour) today voted against the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), arguing that it flouts agreed EU laws on counterfeiting and piracy online.

In addition, the Parliament's decision today states that MEPs will go to the Court of Justice if the EU does not reject ACTA rules, including cutting off users from the Internet "gradually" if caught stealing content.

Though MEPs cannot participate in the ACTA talks, without the consent of the European Parliament, EU negotiators will have to go back to the drawing board and come up with a compromise.

Parliament threatens court action on anti-piracy treaty

20 Comments Add a comment

PaulR #1 7:59 AM Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 Reply

Dang!
Cory posted the link just seconds after I submitted my "Suggest a Link" for this, so I have to add my
"Way to Go! It's about time they EU Parliament grew a pair!"
here...

Maybe democracy still has a chance.

MasterSauce #2 8:02 AM Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 Reply

Three cheers for common sense.

boingaddict #3 8:04 AM Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 Reply

yeeeey, DIE ACTA DIE!!!!

Anon #4 8:10 AM Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 Reply
DanielZKlein #5 8:11 AM Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 Reply

Huzzah!

Robbo #6 8:27 AM Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 Reply

Yowzah!

risoldi #7 8:31 AM Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 Reply

This is great news! It seems the campaigns against the three strike proposition had some effect. This result was not obvious - the general press mostly ignored the problem, or presented the ACTA-related initiatives as a just war against piracy. The MEPs must have done their homework to research what's behind the proposal. Bravo!

bazzargh #8 9:11 AM Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 Reply

Does anyone know what they actually voted for? I was surprised to see they were voting on ACTA since of course that's still a secret, and it turns out they were voting on an agreed text resulting from a debate on a question about the secrecy:
http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/eu-lawmakers-stand-france-anti-piracy-bill/article-181537

There were 6 texts to vote on, (RC-B7-0154/2010, B7-0154/2010, B7-0158/2010, B7-0173/2010, B7-0179/2010, B7-0180/2010), I presume its the 1st, 2nd, or 4th they agreed to since those are the versions with the court threat. But neither the article above nor the parliament website are getting me any closer to knowing /which/.

carborundum #9 9:18 AM Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 Reply

The petition with 31 signatures is a written petition for European Members of Parliament, that must be physically and personally signed. So 31 in a day or two isn't bad. If more than half sign it within the next three months it will become the official position of the European Parliament.

I just checked and my personal MEP of choice, Emine Bozkurt, has already signed. I'll be mailing her promptly to thank her.

Link to the campaign pages here: http://www.laquadrature.net/en/help-the-european-parliament-oppose-acta

Anon #10 9:49 AM Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 Reply

I'm happy for the Europeans, but this virtually guarantees that the US will vote for it.

S2 replied to comment from bazzargh #11 9:52 AM Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 Reply

How about P7_TA-PROV(2010)0058? From the press release page's link to the adopted text, a .doc file from the 10th at least shows the language that was voted upon. (whew ;-)

Of course, grain of salt since IANAE.

bazzargh replied to comment from bazzargh #12 10:20 AM Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 Reply

Whoops seems I submitted the wrong link. This is the link to the debate and the texts they're voting on:

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=AGENDA&reference=20100310&secondRef=SIT&language=EN#V-54

anansi133 #13 11:55 AM Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 Reply

That almost sounds like something a functional political system might produce. (over there in Europe)

I kind-of wonder what that must be like. (back here in the U.S.)

Anon #14 12:34 PM Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 Reply

Now, I'd hate to contradict the upbeat tone of this article, but the situation is actually better than you've described it. See http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number8.5/acta-european-parliament-position. "In addition, however, and widely unnoticed, a last-minute oral amendment from the conservative EPP group was also adopted. This amendment calls for "the Commission to continue the negotiations on ACTA and limit them to the existing European IPR enforcement system against counterfeiting"."

MadRat #15 5:22 PM Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 Reply

Does this mean the EU is pulling out of ACTA? Does this mean ACTA is dead? What is the significance of this?

Anon #16 11:02 PM Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 Reply

It definately feels good to be european. :D

remmelt #17 12:38 AM Thursday, Mar 11, 2010 Reply

Who are the 13?

Anon #18 8:14 AM Thursday, Mar 11, 2010 Reply
ScribblingSquid #19 12:19 PM Thursday, Mar 11, 2010 Reply

I notice that articles on ACTA often don't mention that quite innocuous things would be counted as "piracy".

An example would be posting your cute new baby pictures on MySpace and then posting them anywhere else. Since MySpace and many other sites claim ownership of any content posted on them, this is the sort of unexpected thing that would be counted as "piracy" in most cases.

Another example would be posting a picture that has a Ford car in it. Ford has gone after people for this sort of thing.

Also, since there is no fact checking of these things, some stalker or troll could simply file a bogus claim against someone they didn't like.

You've got to love that lack of oversight or judicial review (also not mentioned).

Anon #20 5:09 AM Tuesday, Mar 30, 2010 Reply

This brought a tear to my eye. There's now a reason to be cautiously optimistic about democracy prevailing in this world where big business all too easily write the laws that enslave us and kill off innovation.

Send a comment

Unregistered

Read the full moderation policy. Thank you!

 

About

About Boing Boing

Contact Us

Press Inquiries

Policies

Commenting Policy

Archives

Mark Frauenfelder

Cory Doctorow

David Pescovitz

Xeni Jardin

Rob Beschizza

More

Categories

Technology

Gadgets

Culture

Games

Entertainment

Science

Business

Art and Design

Video

Steampunk

Weird

More

Twitter

BoingBoing

Mark

Cory

David

Xeni

Rob

Brandon

Lisa

Maggie

Dean

Facebook

BoingBoing

Shop

Boing Boing Bazaar

Amazon Store

More BB

Boing Boing Video

Flickr Pool

Digg

Wikipedia

Advertise

Display ads

RSS and Email

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution. Boing Boing is a trademark of Happy Mutants LLC in the United States and other countries.